
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]
Copyright @ : - Dr. Shital Asutkar Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID0019 | ISSN : 2584-2757
In a study of 50 patients having CAF participated in quasi-
experimental research at a university hospital in Kerman,
where 25 got 20 units of botulinum toxin and 25 had LIS.
Botulinum toxin was found to be an efficient non-invasive
option in the clinical assessment for the management of
CAF.
[39]
According to the results of some other non-randomized
controlled experiments LIS and botulinum toxin injection
therapies appear to be equally beneficial in the
management of CAF,.
[40]
In a study conducted at Shahed University's performed a
prospective randomized controlled experiment. In this
research, 130 CAF patients were included. Two groups of
patients were created randomly. 65 individuals got oral
nifedipine (ON) and the same amount received topical
nifedipine (TN) . In the topical nifedipine group, ulcer
healing happened in 43 (73.33%) patients as opposed to 29
(49.5%) patients who received oral nifedipine, which was
substantially different (P 0.05). The oral nifedipine group
experienced higher adverse effects than the topical
nifedipine group, including headaches and redness.
Topical nifedipine has a greater function for treating anal
fissures with a positive effect and fewer complications,
even though oral nifedipine can lessen anal fissure
symptoms and indicators.
[41]
The study was carried out at the general surgery division
of a tertiary care facility in Eastern India. It was discovered
in this study that LIS was a superior kind of therapy for
CAF to fissurectomy. LIS had fewer postoperative
complications than fissurectomy. However, there was no
relapse in the fissurectomy group, although there was a
greater rate of relapse in the LIS group.
[42]
In a study Yashtimadhu Ghrita was administered to 18 of
the 36 patients admitted in Group A (n = 18), while
lignocaine-nifedipine ointment was applied locally to 18 of
the 36 Parikartika patients in Group B (n = 18). When
treating Parikartika symptoms, Yashtimadhu Ghrita and
lignocaine-nifedipine ointment both are similarly efficient
(acute fissure in ano). Mild adverse effects were reported
with lignocaine-nifedipine ointment.
[43]
In a study there were 30 patients with fissures in the ano,
of which 15 were in group A and 15 were in group B.
Group A (Ksharasutra) took less time than Group B to
provide postoperative pain, bleeding, edema, and tissue
repair alleviation (OLIS). OLIS produced superior
outcomes in the treatment of Parikartika relative to
Ksharasutra ligation (chronic fissure-in-ano).
[44]
In a study, patients with CAF were arbitrarily chosen from
the OPD and IPD of ShalyaTantra, IPGT, and RA, Gujarat
Ayurved University, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India. 50 patients
in Group A and 50 patients in Group B.
Group-A: Under appropriate anesthetic, Ksharasutra
suturing (KSS) at the fissure bed and trans-fixation of the
sentinel tag, if present, were performed. Compared to
Group-A, patients in Group B (KSS with Lord's anal
dilatation) experienced lower postoperative discomfort and
recovered faster (KSS). Each group’s surgical wounds
healed in 21 days, so it can be deduced that neither
Ksharasutra nor the rectal installation of Jatyadi Taila,
which aided in the rapid healing process, caused any
septicemia. No unfavorable medication or Ksharasutra
side effects were seen throughout or during this surgery.
The study's findings revealed that Ksharasutra is one
modality that may be employed to treat Parikartika.
[45]
There were 50 Parikartika patients altogether. Standard
Apamarga Ksharasutra,sitz bath Panchavalkala kwatha,
Eranda Bhrishta Haritaki Churna 5 g at night, along with
Triphala Guggulu Vati and Jatyadi Taila Pichu (Gauze
soaked in oil) for regional retention over the anal area.
Sentinel pile ksharasutra trans-fixation and ligation (KSL)
an appropriate anesthetic was used when working with the
fissure bed. The study concluded that Parikartika
Ksharasutra ligation, which involves lesser postoperative
discomfort and is simple to conduct, is a great substitute
for contemporary surgery. After the Ksharasutra was
removed, the wound continued to be normal, and the mean
surgical wound recovery duration was 21 days.
Consequently, it is an effective method for treating chronic
fissures.
[46]
In a study of 50 patients were diagnosed with Parikartika
treatment lasted a single stage with Ksharasutra suturing
for Parikartika, and patients were evaluated every week
for up to four weeks at the IPD (male and female Shalya
wards) as well as after leaving the hospital. In all, 56
percent of patients were judged to be cured, while 28
percent of patients were reported to be improving. 10% of
patients showed substantial improvement, while 6% of
patients showed modest improvement. As a result, all
patients received treatment by the evaluation criteria
established for the needed duration for relief in signs and
symptoms, and no patient was identified as having "No
alleviation."
[47]
In a study of 130 cases , 70 cases got complete relief, 29
cases got marked relief.14 cases got moderate relief, 1 case
got mild relief while 16 cases were dropped out from the
study as they did not turn up for follow-up. Thus it is
concluded that the efficacy of this treatment is highly
encouraging and the fissure healed without leaving any
scar. And this can be achieved with minimum expenditure
and without any risk. The principal drug and the
supportive therapy including the diet prescribed, dose
schedule, and duration of the treatment are as Kasisadi